Deputy Minister Letsike Calls for Accountability as MacG Faces Backlash Over Comments on Minnie Dlamini

Outspoken or Out of Order? MacG’s Comments Under Fire: In a digital age where platforms like YouTube and podcasting apps are becoming louder than traditional newsrooms, the boundaries of free speech are continuously being tested — and often crossed.

Contents

One of the latest and most jarring examples comes from controversial podcaster MacG, also known as Macgyver Mukwevho, who is once again at the centre of public outrage following distasteful comments aimed at television personality Minnie Dlamini.

The incident has ignited debate around whether South Africa’s right to freedom of speech protects such speech or whether, as many now argue, it constitutes verbal gender-based violence (GBV). Deputy Minister of Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities, Mmapaseka Letsike, has strongly condemned the remarks and is pushing for MacG to be summoned to Parliament.

Verbal Abuse Disguised as Commentary

While free speech is a cornerstone of any functioning democracy, it does not exist in a vacuum. MacG’s comments — which many found to be misogynistic and degrading — have sparked not only social media fury but official calls for accountability. According to Letsike, his tirade can and should be categorised as online GBV, a form of abuse that inflicts psychological harm through harmful and sexist digital content.

Social media, though applauded for giving everyone a voice, often becomes a breeding ground for hate speech and harmful rhetoric. As traditional media shrinks, platforms with less editorial oversight rise, creating space for unfiltered — and often unchecked — narratives. MacG’s latest episode has not only hurt reputations but also exposed the dangers of influencer platforms misused under the guise of “entertainment.”

Why Parliament’s Involvement Matters

Letsike’s appeal for MacG to face a parliamentary inquiry is more than symbolic. It points to a turning point where the government is being urged to intervene in regulating what many call “digital misogyny.” According to experts, public figures wield great influence — and when they use their platforms irresponsibly, they normalise harmful attitudes, especially toward women.

Her statement also signals an effort to move beyond mere online condemnation and hold digital creators legally accountable. “Verbal assaults pave the way for physical ones,” the editorial in question rightly warned — highlighting the link between verbal GBV and real-world violence.

The Bigger Picture: What Happens When Media Gatekeepers Are Gone?

A disturbing takeaway from this incident is the diminishing presence of traditional journalism. As audiences increasingly turn to influencers and podcasters for information and commentary, the lines between truth, opinion, and abuse get dangerously blurred. Without trained editorial oversight, content becomes susceptible to misinformation and outright abuse.

MacG’s comments are not an isolated case. They echo a broader issue: the decline of responsible media and the rise of unregulated voices. And when these voices perpetuate sexism or hate speech, it’s not just distasteful — it’s dangerous.

Speech Comes With Responsibility

Freedom of speech is a right — but not without responsibility. MacG’s latest scandal serves as a wake-up call for stricter digital accountability in South Africa. As society grapples with gender-based violence in all its forms, verbal assaults like these must be called out, especially when they come from influential voices.

The question now isn’t just about what MacG said — it’s about what South Africa will do next to protect women from online harm masked as entertainment.

CHECK OUT: Musa Khawula Stays in Custody as Court Allows Media to Film Proceedings Despite Objection