Cat’ Matlala’s legal team has formally challenged the decision to detain the accused at Ebongweni Super-Max Prison in Kokstad, arguing that the move undermines his right to a fair trial. The application surfaced during a pre-trial sitting in Johannesburg, where the defence raised procedural and constitutional concerns before proceedings began.
Cat’ Matlala’s Legal Team Raises Fair Trial Concerns
Cat’ Matlala’s legal team insists that holding their client in KwaZulu-Natal places unnecessary barriers between the accused, his lawyers, and the Gauteng courts. The defence maintains that effective legal consultation requires proximity and consistent access, both of which remain limited under the current detention arrangement.
Key issues raised by the defence include:
- Restricted access to legal counsel due to distance
- Delays in consultation ahead of court appearances
- Logistical challenges that affect trial preparation
Background to the Charges and Co-Accused
Matlala faces 11 counts of attempted murder and stands accused alongside several co-accused. They include his wife, Tsakane Matlala, alleged hitmen Musa Kekana and Floyd Mabusela, and Nthabiseng Nzama. Authorities link the case to alleged organised crime activity associated with the so-called Big 5 cartel.
During the court appearance, Matlala appeared in leg irons and formal attire, highlighting the high-security classification attached to his detention.
State and Correctional Services Under Pressure from Cat’ Matlala’s Legal Team
The State confirmed in open court that it was not consulted before the Department of Correctional Services authorised the transfer to Kokstad. This admission placed additional scrutiny on the decision-making process behind the move.
The court placed the pre-trial sitting on hold while awaiting clarity. Correctional Services now faces pressure to justify why Matlala remains outside Gauteng.
What Happens Next in Court
Matlala is expected to return to court on 6 February. If officials fail to provide adequate reasons for the continued detention in KwaZulu-Natal, the defence plans to pursue an urgent application to compel his return to Gauteng.
Legal analysts note that South African courts consistently emphasise access to legal representation as a cornerstone of a fair trial, protected under Section 35 of the Constitution.
Also Read: Brown Mogotsi Demands Parliament Pay for Private Security During ad hoc committee Appearance
