Matthew Chaskalson Leads Madlanga Commission After Terry Motau Quits

In a high-stakes development, Advocate Matthew Chaskalson has taken over as chief evidence leader of the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry. This follows the sudden resignation of Advocate Terry Motau SC, who quit less than 10 days into the role. The move has sparked public interest and heightened scrutiny on the Commission’s critical work.

A Major Shift at a Critical Moment

The Madlanga Commission, officially known as the Commission of Inquiry into Criminality, Political Interference and Corruption in the Criminal Justice System, is under immense pressure. With just six months to complete its work, the Commission’s leadership shake-up comes at a sensitive time.

Read our full breakdown in Madlanga Commission Highlights: Key Moments You Need to Know for a concise timeline of developments.

Chaskalson stepped in after Motau quit unexpectedly. The reason for Motau’s exit remains undisclosed. However, Commission spokesperson Jeremy Michaels confirmed the focus remains on its mandate.

“The Commission is squarely focused on its job – to investigate grave allegations of infiltration and criminal syndicate interference,” Michaels said.

Who Is Matthew Chaskalson?

Matthew Chaskalson SC is no stranger to high-profile commissions. He previously served on the Marikana Commission of Inquiry and the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into State Capture.

Chaskalson brings extensive experience and credibility to a process now facing mounting pressure. His legal career has been marked by constitutional work and public law expertise.

“Chaskalson is a seasoned evidence leader who understands the scope, sensitivity, and scale of inquiries like this,” said Professor Thuli Madonsela, former Public Protector.

Terry Motau: A Sudden Departure

Terry Motau, known for his sharp legal acumen and role in the VBS Bank probe, stepped down less than two weeks into the Commission. The departure surprised insiders and raised questions about the internal dynamics of the inquiry.

Although no official reason has been given, the move comes amid escalating tensions and a massive workload.

Commission’s Tight Deadline and Expansive Scope

President Cyril Ramaphosa established the Commission to cleanse the criminal justice system of corruption and political interference. Its terms of reference are broad, encompassing law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and high-level executive decisions.

The Commission has just six months to deliver a final report. The timeline is ambitious, especially considering the depth of investigation required.

First Testimonies Shake the Nation

On 17 September 2025, Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, KwaZulu-Natal’s provincial police commissioner, testified at the first public hearing.

He accused powerful figures of disbanding key task teams and interfering in investigations. These revelations jolted the public and set the tone for what lies ahead.

“The interference goes to the heart of state security and criminal accountability,” Mkhwanazi stated under oath.

For more on health sector accountability, see Tembisa Hospital Corruption Report: Motsoaledi & Lesufi Join SIU.

Upcoming Witnesses: Khumalo on the Stand

General Dumisani Khumalo, head of police crime intelligence, is set to testify next. He was arrested earlier this year and has since been sidelined. His appearance is expected to shed more light on the extent of criminal capture within the police service.

The stakes are high. The Commission will need to carefully manage security, confidentiality, and transparency as more explosive information surfaces.

Commission Structure: Who’s Who

The Commission is chaired by retired Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, sitting with two commissioners. The legal team now includes:

• Matthew Chaskalson SC (Chief Evidence Leader)
• Advocate Mahlape Sello SC
• Advocate Adila Hassim
• A fourth advocate is being recruited to strengthen the team.

The support staff consists of only 25 to 30 individuals, far fewer than previous commissions.

Pressure Mounts on Ramaphosa

This Commission is vital for President Ramaphosa, who is seeking to rebuild trust in state institutions. Its outcomes could influence key appointments in police, intelligence, and the justice system.

“We need this report to guide reforms and clear the rot in our criminal justice system,” said Justice Ministry spokesperson Advocate Siya Mthembu.

There is growing speculation that Ramaphosa himself could be called to testify. This would mark a major moment in the inquiry.

Public Expectations and Transparency Concerns

While the Commission has moved swiftly, concerns remain about transparency. Some evidence may not be publicised, particularly where undercover agents are involved.

Matthew Chaskalson explained:

“If the identity of undercover operatives is exposed, their lives are at risk. Human life must be prioritised.”

However, civil society groups have called for as much openness as possible.

Political Fallout and a Parallel Inquiry

A second inquiry, led by Parliament, is set to begin on 7 October. It will also explore Mkhwanazi’s claims. He is scheduled to testify over two days.

With dual processes now underway, South Africa’s criminal justice sector is under an unprecedented microscope.

“We have to get to the bottom of this. The country deserves answers,” said Corruption Watch’s Executive Director Karam Singh.

Discover the full story in Gauteng Police Arrest 1,500+ Suspects in Weekend Crime Operation.

Looking Ahead: Can the Commission Deliver?

With Chaskalson now at the helm, the Commission is expected to push forward with greater momentum. Yet challenges remain: limited time, a growing caseload, and the political sensitivities of its work.

There is cautious optimism among observers.

A Crucial Moment for South Africa

The resignation of Terry Motau and the rise of Matthew Chaskalson come at a pivotal juncture. The Madlanga Commission’s findings could reshape South Africa’s justice landscape.

For now, all eyes are on the next witness, the evidence to be revealed, and whether this Commission can live up to its mandate. One thing is clear: the truth must prevail.