Judge Cowen Admits Uncertainty in Response to Malema’s Question on Land Issue

Judge Susannah Cowen Acknowledges Legal Ambiguity on Land Expropriation Without Compensation

During a Judicial Service Commission (JSC) interview, EFF leader Julius Malema posed a challenging question to Judge Susannah Cowen regarding the legal framework for land expropriation without compensation. Malema sought clarity on whether the South African Constitution allows for this type of land reform, particularly when it involves indigenous land.

Judge Cowen’s Response: Admitting Uncertainty

Judge Cowen candidly admitted uncertainty, stating, “I don’t know the answer.” Her response highlighted the complexity of interpreting constitutional provisions related to land reform. This admission drew attention to the ongoing legal challenges in addressing South Africa’s historical land injustices.

The Importance of Land Reform for EFF

Malema’s line of questioning emphasized the central role of land reform in the EFF’s political agenda. The party advocates for land redistribution as a way to correct historical wrongs, with expropriation without compensation being a key point of debate.

The Debate Around the Constitution and Land Rights

Judge Cowen’s uncertain response reignited discussions about whether the Constitution adequately addresses land expropriation. The issue remains divisive, with different interpretations on how to balance constitutional rights with the need for social and economic justice.

Conclusion: The Tension Between Legal Interpretation and Political Goals

Judge Cowen’s response reflects the complexity of navigating South Africa’s legal system in relation to politically charged topics like land reform. The JSC interview showcased the broader tension between judicial interpretation and the drive for transformative political goals in the country.

Also read: President Cyril Ramaphosa Pays Tribute to the Late Pastor Ray McCauley