Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala challenges SAPS over terminated health services tender amid allegations of procurement irregularities and underperformance.
Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala, a prominent figure in South Africa’s tender terrain, is preparing to take legal action against Police Commissioner Fannie Masemola following the abrupt termination of a R360 million contract awarded to his company, Medicare24 Tshwane District. The contract, intended for the provision of health risk management services to the South African Police Service (SAPS), was cancelled due to alleged procurement irregularities and performance issues.
Background of the Contract
In June 2024, Medicare24 Tshwane District secured a lucrative three-year contract valued at R360 million to deliver health risk management services to SAPS. Matlala, the sole listed director of the company, was expected to oversee the implementation of services aimed at enhancing the health and wellness of police personnel.
Reasons for Termination
Commissioner Masemola’s decision to terminate the contract was based on findings from a forensic analysis that uncovered several discrepancies:
- Signature Inconsistencies: Critical bidding documents and pricing schedules contained inconsistent signatures, suggesting potential forgery or misrepresentation.
- Conflicting Roles: Individuals such as James Murray and Mike van Wyk were listed in dual roles across the franchisor and franchisee entities, raising concerns about the transparency of the company’s structure.
- Employment of Former SAPS Official: Brigadier Petunia Lenono, a former SAPS official involved in the bid evaluation process, was later employed by Medicare24 Tshwane District, contravening clauses in the service level agreement.
- Underperformance: Despite prior engagements, Medicare24 Tshwane District reportedly failed to meet contractual expectations across various workstreams.
Legal Response from Matlala
In a letter dated May 13, 2025, Matlala’s attorney, Marine Marais, contested the termination, labeling it as “unlawful, premature, and in breach” of the service level agreement. The letter emphasized that the agreement mandated a dispute resolution process before any termination could occur based on disputed allegations.
Broader Implications
This legal dispute adds to the growing scrutiny surrounding Matlala, who has been linked to various controversies, including allegations of fraud related to the Tembisa Hospital investigation. The unfolding situation raises questions about the integrity of procurement processes within SAPS and the measures in place to prevent potential conflicts of interest.
A Closer Look at the Outcome
As the legal battle between Vusimuzi Matlala and SAPS unfolds, it underscores the critical importance of transparency and due diligence in public procurement processes. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled in the future, highlighting the need for stringent oversight mechanisms within government contracts.
Also read: Gauteng Police Captain in Court Over Serious Rape Allegations Shocking the SAPS Community
