On 15 March 2025, the United States launched a series of military strikes against Yemen’s Houthi rebels, leaving at least 33 dead and over 100 injured. The operation, authorised by US President Donald Trump, was aimed at deterring Houthi attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea.
Why the Red Sea Matters
The Red Sea is one of the world’s most vital trade routes, carrying nearly 10% of global maritime commerce. In recent months, Houthi forces—an Iran-aligned militia—have intensified their attacks on ships passing through the area, drawing international concern.
A Pentagon spokesperson stated, “The targeted airstrikes successfully neutralised key Houthi military installations, including missile sites and radar systems used to attack commercial shipping.”
However, the Houthis condemned the operation, calling it “blatant aggression.” Mohammed Abdul Salam, a senior Houthi official, warned, “The US will bear the consequences of these reckless attacks. We will not remain silent.”
Civilians Caught in the Crossfire
The airstrikes have intensified an already dire humanitarian crisis in Yemen. Hospitals in cities like Sanaa and Hudaydah were flooded with casualties, many of whom were women and children.
The UN’s Special Envoy to Yemen, Hans Grundberg, expressed grave concern: “Yemen has endured years of conflict. Further escalation will only deepen the suffering of civilians who are already on the brink.”
Humanitarian organisations, including the Red Cross, have called for immediate de-escalation and access to aid for those affected by the violence.
Trump’s Justification for Military Action
Trump defended the strikes as a necessary response to “ongoing Houthi aggression.” In a statement on Truth Social, he declared, “The attacks on international commerce will not be tolerated. We will ensure the safety of our allies and partners.
Political analysts suggest that the strikes were not just about the Houthis but also a message to Iran. Dr. Matthew Schmidt, an international relations expert at the University of New Haven, explained, “Trump’s decision was as much about deterring Iran’s influence as it was about protecting global trade.”
Global Reactions and Diplomatic Fallout
The airstrikes sparked strong reactions worldwide.
- UK & EU: The United Kingdom and the European Union expressed cautious support, urging a diplomatic resolution to avoid escalation.
- Iran: Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian condemned the attacks as “illegal and reckless,” warning they would “destabilise the region further.”
- China & Russia: Both nations criticised the strikes, calling for de-escalation through diplomacy.
What This Means for the Middle East
The Houthis are part of a broader network of Iran-backed militias operating across the Middle East. If the US continues military operations, analysts warn it could further entangle Washington in Yemen’s long-standing conflict.
Lina Khatib, a Middle East expert at Chatham House, noted, “This isn’t just about Yemen—it’s about power struggles in the region. The US must tread carefully to avoid unintended consequences.”
What’s Next for US Involvement?
While the airstrikes were meant to deter further Houthi aggression, history has shown that military force alone rarely resolves conflicts like Yemen’s.
Dr. Bruce Riedel, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, cautioned, “Airstrikes might weaken Houthi capabilities temporarily, but without a long-term peace plan, the cycle of violence will continue.”
The latest US airstrikes on Yemen represent a major escalation in Red Sea tensions, with civilian casualties mounting and global reactions divided. As the situation unfolds, the question remains: Will this military action lead to lasting security, or will it drag the region into deeper conflict?
ALSO READ: US Aid Cuts Cost 15,000 SA Healthcare Jobs as Trump Slams Land Policy
