“Mkhwanazi Lied To South Africa!” Slams Sibiya In Ad Hoc Committee Hearing

Parliament is probing wide-ranging allegations that touch SAPS leadership and national security. The Ad Hoc Committee Hearing followed several days of testimony, including from Mkhwanazi himself. Parliament confirms it concluded Mkhwanazi’s evidence and moved to other witnesses thereafter.

Sibiya’s central claim and tone

Deputy National Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya pushed back strongly. In an eNCA briefing, he said, “Mkhwanazi lied to South Africa.” He positioned his appearance as a direct rebuttal to claims of interference and collusion.

Read more about how President Ramaphosa admitted to knowing the alleged Tembisa Hospital corruption boss in our full report.

Mkhwanazi’s allegations at a glance

Mkhwanazi alleged political interference and criminal infiltration in the justice system. He briefed the committee in early October and expanded on his July claims. Parliament’s official updates set the sequence and scope of these hearings.

The 121 PKTT dockets controversy

A key flashpoint is the 121 dockets linked to the Political Killings Task Team. Sibiya rejected the idea that he stalled arrests by removing dockets. He argued that many were old and that arrests could have proceeded earlier.

Contact with Matlala and Mogotsi

Sibiya acknowledged limited contact with “Cat” Matlala and Brown Mogotsi. He framed these as incidental or work-related, not collusive. He insisted none of the PKTT dockets involved Matlala. These points remain under scrutiny by Parliament.

What Parliament says about timing and process

The process has been contested. In early September, Parliament denied that Sibiya had already been summoned to appear. By mid-October, Parliament formally scheduled Sibiya’s testimony. This sequence matters for claims about who misled the public.

Direct quotes that define the record

Sibiya’s categorical denial is on record, he said: “I don’t commit crime, I’m not involved in crime.” This quote captures his overall stance before the committee.
Parliament also recorded that it “concludes evidence of the first witness”, signalling a structured process and orderly sequence.

Discover how Sibiya revealed that the AKA murder arrests strained his relationship with Mkhwanazi in our detailed report.

What is verified right now

First, the committee heard from Mkhwanazi, then proceeded to other witnesses, including Sibiya. This is documented on the parliamentary portal and in media alerts. The official notices confirm dates, line-up, and live-stream availability.
Second, Sibiya’s appearance featured a pointed rebuttal. He disputed claims about the 121 dockets and his relations with alleged underworld figures.

What remains under investigation

However, Sibiya’s assertions are not findings. The committee is still testing evidence and hearing multiple sides. Parliament’s page compiles statements, videos, and terms of reference for continuing sessions. Expect further examination of the dockets issue and the alleged links.

Why this matters for Gauteng

Gauteng residents feel the impact of organised crime and political violence. Clarity on SAPS leadership, task-team oversight, and prosecutorial follow-through affects safety outcomes. The committee’s conclusions could shape future accountability and resourcing. Keep an eye on the official portal for decisions and next steps.

Find out why Premier Lesufi suspended the Gauteng Health boss over the Tembisa Hospital scandal in our full story.

Bottom line

The phrase “Mkhwanazi lied” is Sibiya’s rebuttal, not an official determination. The verified record shows a live, evolving inquiry with competing narratives. To date, Parliament has verified the timeline, not the full substance of the claims. The committee will need to reconcile contradictory testimony with documents, logs, and case-file trails.