Vusimuzi ‘Cat’ Matlala Denied Bail, Remains Behind Bars

Johannesburg High Court Upholds Previous Bail Ruling

Alleged cartel member Vusimuzi ‘Cat’ Matlala has once again been denied bail, remaining in custody following a ruling by the Johannesburg High Court. The decision reinforces a prior judgment by the Alexandra Magistrate’s Court, which declared Matlala a flight risk.

High-Profile Case Draws Public Attention

The case of ‘Cat’ Matlala denied bail continues to draw widespread attention due to its high-profile nature and connection to well-known figures in South Africa’s entertainment industry. Matlala faces multiple criminal charges, including attempted murder, conspiracy to commit murder, fraud, money laundering, and defeating the ends of justice.

‘Cat’ Matlala Denied Bail for Charges Linked to Shooting of Tebogo Thobejane

‘Cat’ Matlala denied bail and the most serious charge stems from an alleged shooting incident involving actress and socialite Tebogo Thobejane, best known for her role in Muvhango. The incident reportedly took place in 2023 on the N1 highway near Sandton, where Thobejane was shot in the foot. Authorities have linked Matlala to the attack, which investigators allege was part of a broader criminal conspiracy.

Previous Bail Denial at Alexandra Magistrate’s Court

In September, the Alexandra Magistrate’s Court initially denied Matlala bail, citing a strong likelihood that he might attempt to flee the country if released. Despite a subsequent appeal, the Johannesburg High Court upheld the ruling, agreeing that Matlala posed both a flight risk and a potential threat to witnesses.

Co-Accused Appear in Court

Matlala appeared in court on 7 October 2025 alongside his co-accused:

• Tsakani Matlala, his wife,
• Musa Kekana and Tiego Floyd Mabusela, alleged hitmen,
• Nthabiseng Nzama, Mabusela’s daughter.

All five face identical charges. Kekana and Mabusela have since abandoned their bail applications, while Tsakani and Nzama were released on bail amounts of R20 000 and R10 000, respectively.

Prosecution Argues Strong Case Against Matlala

‘Cat’ Matlala Denied Bail – Prosecutors presented detailed evidence linking Matlala to organised criminal activity, emphasising his role in coordinating the alleged hit on Thobejane. The State argued that releasing him would compromise ongoing investigations and place witnesses at risk.

Court documents also suggest that Matlala had access to significant financial resources, raising fears that he could easily evade authorities if granted bail.

‘Cat’ Matlala Denied Bail: Defence Maintains Innocence

‘Cat’ Matlala denied bail; however, his defence team maintains his innocence, arguing that the charges are speculative and unsupported by concrete evidence. They contend that Matlala’s continued detention violates his right to a fair trial and that the State’s case relies heavily on circumstantial claims.

However, both the Magistrate’s Court and the High Court have found that the evidence presented by prosecutors warrants his continued detention pending trial.

What Happens Next

The case is expected to proceed to a full trial in early 2026, where the prosecution will present its case against Matlala and his co-accused. Investigators are reportedly still pursuing leads related to the alleged criminal network behind the shooting.

Authorities have described the case as part of a broader crackdown on organised crime in Gauteng, with law enforcement vowing to dismantle violent syndicates operating within the province.

Also Read: KT Molefe’s Cartel Links (The Big 5) & Fugitive Nephew Still on The Run

Public Reaction and Broader Implications

The public response to the ‘Cat’ Matlala denied bail decision has been mixed. Supporters of Thobejane have welcomed the ruling, citing it as a victory for victims of gender-based and organised violence. Others have questioned the pace of justice and the fairness of extended pre-trial detentions.

Legal analysts note that the case underscores South Africa’s growing focus on accountability and justice in high-profile criminal matters. The outcome of Matlala’s trial could set a significant precedent for how courts handle alleged organised crime in the country.