After falling ill in the witness box, Lombaard’s testimony faces scrutiny as court proceedings continue.
The trial into the disappearance of six-year-old Joshlin Smith continues in Saldanha, Western Cape, with key witness Laurentia Lombaard at the center of courtroom drama. Lombaard, who transitioned from an accused to a state witness, fell ill twice on Wednesday, March 20, 2024, while being cross-examined, raising concerns about whether the prosecution may need to call a new witness.
Lombaard’s Health Issues Disrupt Testimony
During her cross-examination, Lombaard requested to be excused before 11 a.m., prompting Judge Nathan Erasmus to adjourn the session. The judge informed the courtroom that she was unwell and stated that if she could not proceed, the case would be rolled over to the following day. However, 45 minutes later, she returned to the witness box, ready to continue answering questions from defense attorney Fanie Harmse, representing Jacquen “Boeta” Appollis.
Despite resuming her testimony, Lombaard fell ill again, forcing the court to adjourn for the day. At the time, it was uncertain whether she would be able to continue, and the State indicated it might have to call another witness if her condition did not improve.
Lombaard Returns to the Stand with a Doctor’s Note
On Thursday morning, March 21, 2024, Lombaard returned to the witness box and presented a doctor’s note to Judge Erasmus, confirming that she was fit to proceed. The judge, after reviewing the document, assured the court that her medical condition would not be placed on record but confirmed that she was capable of continuing her testimony. He urged her to stay calm, listen carefully to the questions, and provide clear and truthful answers.
Defense Challenges Lombaard’s Statements
During the proceedings, defense lawyer Fanie Harmse questioned Lombaard about the whereabouts of her children on February 18, 2024, the morning that Joshlin disappeared. In her earlier testimony, she stated that her children were with her at Kelly Smith’s residence. However, when Judge Erasmus asked why this detail was not included in her original statement, she admitted to making a mistake—a mistake that the judge pointed out had been repeated at least four times.
The defense has also focused on alleged discrepancies in her testimony, especially regarding Kelly Smith’s temper and violent behavior, including breaking a window, injuring herself, and threatening to kill Boeta with a knife. These inconsistencies have raised questions about Lombaard’s credibility as a witness.
Trial Continues Amid High Tension
As the trial enters its third week, the community and court remain focused on Lombaard’s testimony, which could play a crucial role in determining the fate of the accused—Kelly Smith, Jacquen Appollis, and Steveno van Rhyn. The State’s case hinges on her statements, and any further disruptions could impact the prosecution’s strategy.
Despite her health setbacks, Lombaard is back on the stand, and the court is expected to hear more revelations as cross-examination continues.
Also read: Bail Application of SASSA Employees and Co-Accused Postponed to April 1 in Theft Case
