The long-standing debate over the publication of matric results on newspapers has returned to the spotlight. In a recent High Court hearing, the Department of Basic Education (DBE) and the Information Regulator (IR) locked horns over whether publishing these results violates South Africa’s privacy laws.
Why the Court Is Involved Again
The issue centres around the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). The Information Regulator believes that even publishing results using only exam numbers breaches the Act. The DBE, however, insists that no personal data is disclosed when names are excluded.
On 27–28 October 2025, the matter was heard before a full bench of the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria. The court has now reserved judgment.
Background to the Dispute
This legal fight started in November 2024 when the IR issued an enforcement notice to the DBE. It ordered the department to stop publishing matric results in newspapers. The IR also imposed a R5 million fine.
In response, the DBE challenged the notice in court, arguing that it did not breach POPIA. An urgent application to halt the January 2025 results publication was dismissed by the court, allowing the DBE to proceed.
Looking to prepare for your exams? Read our guide on Where to Download Past Matric Exam Papers: A Complete Guide to access official DBE papers and boost your revision.
Arguments from the Information Regulator
The IR contends that learners’ exam numbers, when published with results, still qualify as personal information. According to POPIA, personal information includes any data that can indirectly identify a person.
“Up until now, no court has rightfully examined whether the publication of matric results is consistent with the principles of protection of personal information,” said Advocate Pansy Tlakula, Chairperson of the Information Regulator.
The IR insists the DBE must obtain consent or prove a lawful basis under Section 11 of POPIA before publishing results publicly.
DBE’s Defence of the Practice
The Department argues that exam numbers are not identifiable and that publishing results supports transparency. It also believes that many learners in rural areas depend on newspapers to access their results.
The DBE further argues that previous court decisions, including one in 2022, allowed results to be published in their current format.
“The method we use respects privacy and ensures accessibility. No names are published, only exam numbers,” stated a DBE spokesperson.
Who Else Is Involved in the Case?
AfriForum joined the case in support of the DBE, calling the IR’s stance excessive. Meanwhile, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) backed the IR, stating the publication may cause emotional harm to learners who underperform.
Learner advocacy groups like COSAS also support removing results from the media. They argue that results should remain confidential between schools and learners.
Why the Publication of Matric Results On Newspapers Matters
This is not just a legal issue, it affects thousands of families across the country. In areas with limited internet access, newspapers remain a reliable way to receive matric results. However, privacy concerns cannot be ignored.
The final ruling will set a precedent for how educational data can be shared publicly under South African law.
When Will the Ruling Be Made?
The North Gauteng High Court has not given a specific date for judgment. However, a decision is expected before the release of the 2025 matric results in early 2026.
This ruling will determine if the DBE can legally continue publishing exam results in newspapers or must change its approach.
Stay organised and plan ahead with our detailed guide on 2025 Matric Exam Timetable — Key Dates & Highlights for all important exam schedules and updates.
Privacy vs Public Access
The outcome of this case will shape the future of information transparency and privacy rights in education. While the DBE stresses access and fairness, the Information Regulator champions data protection.
All eyes are now on the court’s final decision.
