As tensions between Iran and Israel continue to rise, foreign policy experts have strongly advised the African National Congress (ANC) to stay neutral. The ANC’s position on international conflicts has significant implications, especially considering South Africa’s foreign policy history, which emphasises non-alignment and diplomacy. By remaining neutral on the Iran-Israel conflict, experts argue, the ANC can preserve South Africa’s diplomatic balance and protect its strategic interests globally.
Why Foreign Policy Experts Advise ANC to Stay Neutral on Iran-Israel Conflict
Foreign policy experts advise the ANC to stay neutral on the Iran-Israel conflict to ensure South Africa’s reputation as a peaceful mediator remains intact. South Africa’s foreign policy is deeply rooted in the principles of non-alignment, established during the country’s post-apartheid transition. This approach has been instrumental in maintaining positive diplomatic relationships with a broad spectrum of global actors, from Western powers to emerging economies like China and Russia.
According to Professor André du Plessis, a political analyst at Stellenbosch University, “South Africa’s foreign policy has historically focused on stability, dialogue, and multilateralism, not on choosing sides in polarising conflicts.” Du Plessis warns that taking a side in the Iran-Israel conflict could lead to unintended consequences, including alienating vital trade and diplomatic partners. His sentiment is echoed by Dr. Nontobeko Hlela, a research fellow at the University of Johannesburg, who suggests that “South Africa’s commitment to peace-building and multilateralism would be undermined by taking a public stance in this ongoing conflict.”
The ANC’s Strategic Need for Diplomatic Balance
In a deeply polarised global context, where every action can send ripples across the international community, maintaining neutrality allows South Africa to preserve its diplomatic balance. By staying out of the Iran-Israel conflict, the ANC safeguards South Africa’s relationships with a diverse range of countries.
While South Africa has been vocal in its support for Palestinian rights and critical of Israeli policies in the past, experts argue that it is crucial for the country to avoid direct involvement in the current hostilities. South Africa’s government has frequently called for peace through dialogue and adherence to international law, a stance that aligns with its broader diplomatic strategy.
Professor André du Plessis further notes that “South Africa’s ability to mediate and offer peace-building initiatives is compromised when it is seen to be aligned with one side of the conflict.” This perspective is in line with South Africa’s historical role in mediating other international disputes, such as its involvement in peace negotiations in Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Historical Precedents for Non-alignment
South Africa’s commitment to non-alignment has been tested several times on the global stage, particularly during the United Nations debates on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Despite mounting pressure to take sides, South Africa has consistently emphasised the importance of dialogue and peaceful resolution. The country’s approach to foreign policy, especially under the ANC leadership, has often prioritised multilateralism and adherence to international law over partisan support for either of the conflicting parties in the Middle East.
One notable example is South Africa’s case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, where it called for Israel to adhere to international law regarding its treatment of Palestinians. However, even in this instance, South Africa framed its approach within the context of international legal norms rather than direct involvement in the military or political aspects of the conflict.
Dr. Nontobeko Hlela adds, “South Africa has a history of addressing global injustices through multilateral platforms like the UN and the International Criminal Court, rather than taking sides in military conflicts.” This diplomatic track record reinforces the view that the ANC’s best course of action is to remain neutral in the current Iran-Israel conflict.
ALSO READ: Airlines That Have Suspended Middle East Flights Due to Accreditation Issues and Escalating Conflict
The Economic and Political Implications of Taking a Side
The ANC’s decision to stay neutral in the Iran-Israel conflict is not just a matter of ethical diplomacy but also a strategic one. South Africa’s economic and political relationships with countries across the globe depend on its ability to maintain diplomatic neutrality.
South Africa’s trade relations with Israel, as well as its membership in BRICS (the association of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), are important factors in shaping the country’s foreign policy. At the same time, South Africa has significant ties with Iran, particularly in terms of energy and trade. Choosing to support one side over the other could potentially disrupt these vital economic relationships, harming South Africa’s long-term strategic interests.
Moreover, South Africa’s role as a member of the African Union, which advocates for peace and stability on the continent, means that maintaining neutrality is essential for the country’s leadership on global issues. By remaining neutral, South Africa can continue to advocate for diplomatic resolutions and support peace efforts in the Middle East and beyond.
Neutrality as the Best Path Forward
In conclusion, experts advise that the ANC’s best course of action regarding the Iran-Israel conflict is to maintain a neutral stance. This advice aligns with South Africa’s foreign policy objectives of promoting peace, stability, and multilateral diplomacy. By staying neutral, the ANC will avoid alienating key international partners and uphold South Africa’s longstanding tradition of non-alignment.
As Professor du Plessis aptly puts it, “In times of such geopolitical tension, neutrality allows South Africa to act as a bridge for peace rather than being drawn into the conflict.” The ANC’s commitment to non-alignment remains a cornerstone of South Africa’s foreign policy and is crucial for preserving the country’s diplomatic standing on the global stage.
